Australian real estate company involved in a variety of real estate investments… 1 answer below »

Australian real estate company involved in a variety of real estate investments…
1 answer below »

Assessment 1 System Analysis and Modelling CSE2SDX Information System Development Before you begin
Background
Properprop is an Australian real estate company involved in a variety of real estate investments and activities. The company has a large number of customers who require a range of different real estate related services.
Properprop has a website that assists customers in finding suitable properties to rent or purchase. Customers can search the website for properties based on suburb and price. If a customer can’t find any matches, they are asked to contact the company via phone or online messaging to ask the company to search on their behalf. A Properprop agent then searches other real estate databases that they have access to for potential matches. If the agent finds any matches, they then contact the real estate companies responsible for those properties and update the customer on their findings.
If a property is found that the customer wants to inspect, they can make an appointment with an agent to view the property. After the inspection, if the customer decides to buy or rent the property, the responsible agent will prepare the relevant paperwork. The agent then makes a record of the property data and the buyer/tenant’s information for future use.
As a result of increasing demand for their services Properprop has decided to design and implement a web-based information system to assist in the management of their processes. It is envisaged that the information systems will manage the overall operational activities and processes of the organisation, from property management through to the management of real estate agencies, individual agents, clients, and all related financial transactions. The system will be required to provide comprehensive reports for the purpose of analyzing the real estate agency’s performance and efficiency. These reports will enable Properprop’s management to make better- informed decisions.
The system should address as a minimum the following requirements: Assist customers to search for different properties based on: Property type, i.e., house, townhouse, unit, apartment, vacant block. Price range Suburb, address, postcode Min and max bedrooms and/or min and max bathrooms Car spaces Availability date Assist customers to register their information and preferences Inform registered prospective customers by email whenever a property that matches their preferences becomes available Maintain all properties in the database and keep seller and owner information You are asked to analyse and design an information system for the above scenario using object- oriented methodology.
You can make any reasonable assumptions about the case scenario. Tasks Task 1 – Requirements Gathering [3 marks] What requirements analysis strategy (or strategies) you would recommend to Properprop for this case study? You may recommend a combination of different methodologies. You need to justify your answer with an explanation as to why you have given your recommendation. [1 Mark] What requirements gathering technique (or techniques) you would recommend to Properprop for this case study? You may recommend a combination of different techniques. You need to justify your answer with an explanation as to why you have given your recommendation [1 Mark] What system development methodology would you recommend to Properprop for developing the information system case study? Justify your answer. [1 Mark]
Task 2 – Requirements Modelling [7.5 marks] Let’s assume that you have used one or more appropriate requirement gathering techniques to capture stakeholder requirements. Using information in the scenario create a table and list at least 10 functional requirements; and 5 non-functional requirements that it would be expected the client would have. [2.5 marks]. Create a goal model based on the functional and non-functional requirements identified in Task 2-1 and make a summary of the requirements. It is recommended you make use of “Why” and “How” questions to assess your goal model and to determine whether the structure of your goals model is reasonable or not. [2.5 marks]. Identify at least 5 potential users of the system and write at least 2 user stories for each type of user. It is recommended to use the outlined structure below for defining user stories. [2.5 marks]
“As a [type of user], I want to [perform some task] so that I can [achieve some goal].”
Task 3 – Requirements Analysis [4.5 marks] Based on the captured and modelled requirements identified in Task 2-1 and Task 2-2 and your user stories in Task 2-3: Analyse the requirements Identify at least 5 features/functionality to address requirements. And justify your answer and explain how the recommended features/functionality in the Properprop information system can address each of the requirements.[4.5 marks]
Submission
When you have completed the tasks, submit your answer via the Upload link on the LMS. You should submit Tasks 1, 2, and 3 in a single Word document called xxx_cse2sdx_assessment1.docx (where xxx is your student number) with clearly labeled headings for each task. Assessment Marking Criteria

Task No.
Total Marks
Criteria (Expectation for HD) Mark
1-1
1 No answer or answers are incorrect and/or irrelevant. 0 No comparison but has chosen an appropriate strategy or combination of different strategies. No Justification or justification is not clear, or not reasonable and does not make sense.
0.2 No comparison but has chosen an appropriate strategy or combination of different strategies. Justifications are clear, reasonable and make sense.
0.4 Has compared some of the relevant requirements analysis techniques, has chosen an appropriate strategy or combination of different strategies, has justified the selected strategy/ies appropriateness.
Justifications are clear, reasonable and make sense.
0.6 Has compared many of the relevant requirements analysis techniques, has chosen an appropriate strategy or combination of different strategies, has justified the selected strategy/ies appropriateness.
Justifications are clear, reasonable and make sense.
0.8 Has compared all the relevant requirements analysis techniques, has chosen an appropriate strategy or combination of different strategies, has justified the selected strategy/ies appropriateness. Justifications are clear, reasonable and make sense.
1
1-2
1 No answer or answers are incorrect and/or irrelevant. 0 No comparison but has chosen an appropriate technique or combination of the different requirement gathering techniques. No justification or justification is not clear, or not reasonable and does not make sense.
0.2 No comparison but has chosen an appropriate technique or combination of different techniques.
Justifications are clear, reasonable and make sense.
0.4 Has compared some of the relevant requirement analysis techniques, has chosen an appropriate technique or combination of different strategies, has justified the selected strategy/ies appropriateness.
Justifications are clear, reasonable and make sense.
0.6 Has compared many of the relevant requirement gathering strategies, has chosen an appropriate strategy or combination of different strategies, has justified the selected strategy/ies appropriateness.
Justifications are clear, reasonable and make sense.
0.8 Has compared all different requirement gathering strategies, has chosen an appropriate strategy or combination of different strategies, has justified the selected strategy/ies appropriateness. Justifications are clear, reasonable and make sense.
1
1-3
1 No answer or answers are incorrect and/or irrelevant. 0 No comparison but has chosen an appropriate methodology or combination of the different system development methodologies. No Justification or justification is not clear, or not reasonable and does not make sense.
0.2 No comparison but has chosen an appropriate method or combination of different system development methodologies. Justifications are clear, reasonable and make sense.
0.4 Has compared some of the relevant system development methodologies, has chosen an appropriate methodology or combination of different system development methodologies, has justified the selected methodology/ies appropriateness.
Justifications are clear, reasonable and make sense.
0.6 Has compared many of the relevant system development methodologies, has chosen an appropriate strategy or combination of different methodologies, has justified the selected methodology/ies appropriateness. Justifications are clear, reasonable and make sense.
0.8 Has compared all different system development methodologies, has chosen an appropriate strategy or combination of different strategies, has justified the selected strategy/ies appropriateness. Justifications are clear, reasonable and make sense.
1
2-1
2.5 No answer or answers are incorrect and/or irrelevant. 0 Has found some of functional and non-functional requirements. However, there are some errors and some of the explanations are not clear.
1
Has found many of functional and non-functional requirements and they are correct and complete. The explanations are clear and easy to understand without errors.
1.75 Has found all functional and non-functional requirements. The explanations are clear and easy to understand without errors. Has used the correct format.
2.5
2-2
2.5 No answer or answers are incorrect and/or irrelevant. 0 Has not covered all aspects of the stakeholders requirements, it has not been clearly shown the highlevel requirements. There are some errors in using notations and structure. The goal model is not clear and cannot be understood easily.
0.5 Has not covered all aspects of the stakeholders’ requirements, but the goal model covers the high-level requirements. There are some errors in notations and structure. However, the goal model can be understood.
1 Has covered some of the aspects of the stakeholders’ requirements, has clearly shown the high-level requirements, there are few errors in notations and structure however the goal model can be understood.
1.5 Has covered many aspects of the stakeholders’ requirements, has clearly shown the high-level requirements, has used the correct notations and structure. The goal model is clear and easy to understand without syntactic errors.
2
Has covered all aspects of the stakeholders’ requirements, has clearly shown the high-level requirements, has used the correct notations and structure. The goal model is clear and easy to understand without syntactic errors.
2.5
2-3
2.5 No answer or answers are incorrect and/or irrelevant. 0 Has not identified all the potential users. The format of user stories is not correct. Less than three user stories have been prepared and they are not clear and easy to understand. The user stories are not completely aligned with stakeholders’ requirements.
0.5 Has identified some of the potential users. The format of user stories is correct. There are less than three user stories, but all are clear and easy to understand. Not all the user stories are aligned with stakeholders’ requirements.
1

Has identified some of the potential users. The format of user stories is correct. Three user stories have been prepared but one or two are not clear and easy to understand. The user stories are aligned with stakeholders’ requirements.
1.5 Has identified many of the potential users, has used the correct format for user stories, and prepared three user stories for each type of user. The user stories are clear and easy to understand and are aligned with the elicited requirements.
2 Has identified all the potential users, has used the correct format for user stories, and prepared two user stories for each type of user. The user stories are clear and easy to understand and are align with the elicited requirements.
2.5
3-1
4.5 No answer or answers are incorrect and/or irrelevant. 0 Has found some of the features and relevant functionality. However, there are some errors and some of the explanations are not clear.
1 Has found some of the features and relevant functionality but most of them are incorrect and incomplete. Some of the explanations are not clear and cannot be understood easily.
2 Has found many of the features and relevant functionality and they are correct and complete. The explanations are clear and easy to understand without errors.
3 Has found correct and complete features and relevant functionality. The explanations are clear and easy to understand without errors.
4.5

Attachments: 2787-1-165326….pdfJun 08 2022 06:49 PM

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
Open chat
1
You can contact our live agent via WhatsApp! Via + 1 (409) 205-8984

Feel free to ask questions, clarifications, or discounts available when placing an order.

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code GURUH